If by job tracking you mean tracking applications, use a job application tracker, not field-service software. I would first test Teal for browser-based job capture and resume versions, or Huntr for a deeper pipeline with contacts, notes, tasks, and documents.
This comparison is for U.S. job seekers. It covers saving roles, tracking stages, organizing application materials, and scheduling follow-ups. It does not evaluate tools for dispatching crews, managing work orders, or billing clients.
One distinction saves confusion: autofill completes fields; auto-apply may submit an application. They are not the same feature.
The 10 apps at a glance
The tools below are compared by fit, not forced into a universal ranking. Teal and Huntr have the clearest supporting product information in the supplied research. Several other options need more careful verification before you pay or move your entire search into them.
| App | Best fit | What stands out | Check before committing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teal | Job capture and resume versions | Chrome extension, job tracking, and job-board capture | Current mobile access and plan boundaries |
| Huntr | Detailed pipelines and contacts | Notes, tasks, companies, resumes, and autofill | Free and Pro feature limits |
| OphyAI | Job tracking tied to preparation | Visual stages and next-action planning | Import and document workflows |
| ApplyArc | A structured personal job CRM | Job and contact organization with published plan caps | Current storage limits and syncing |
| Notion | Do-it-yourself tracking | Flexible databases, fields, and stages | Manual setup and upkeep |
| Resumly | Automation-oriented job searching | Vendor describes tracking, email intake, resumes, and auto-applies | Approval and submission controls |
| Simplify+ | Autofill-focused applications | Product positioning combines autofill, tracking, and AI resumes | Pricing, refunds, and supported sites |
| Jobright | A tool to investigate further | Appears in current tracker comparisons | Billing, cancellation, and export options |
| Careerflow | Resume and search workflows | Included in current comparison material | Current tracker scope and refund terms |
| Prentus | Tracking with networking help | Positions job tracking alongside networking and application support | Individual access and data ownership |
How these job application trackers were compared
A useful tracker should make the next application easier to manage, not merely give you another colorful board. The practical test is simple: can you save a role, attach the right resume, record the next action, and find the information again a week later?
Direct vendor pages support the clearest feature descriptions. Comparison pages and review summaries can point to useful differences, but their pricing, limits, and complaints deserve a second check. That matters here because several products change plan rules often.
1. Teal
Teal is a strong first test for job seekers who save openings from several job boards. Its official job tracker is designed to keep opportunities in one workspace, while the Chrome extension supports job capture across more than 40 job sites, including LinkedIn, Indeed, and Glassdoor.
That makes Teal useful at the beginning of the search. Save a promising listing, add its status, and keep the resume version associated with that role instead of searching through browser bookmarks later.
Teal also suits candidates who want multiple resume versions nearby. If your search spans marketing, operations, and customer success roles, that separation can prevent a rushed application with the wrong document.
If native mobile access is essential, verify the current product setup before committing. Teal is primarily described as a browser and extension workflow, so the experience may not match a phone-first app.
2. Huntr
Huntr fits a more detailed application pipeline. Its product page describes tracking notes, dates, tasks, job descriptions, salaries, locations, company information, and other opportunity details in one place.
The Huntr Chrome extension adds job, contact, company, and resume organization to the browser workflow. Huntr also positions its application tools around resume creation, tailored documents, and form assistance. Use it when one opportunity has many moving parts.
A practical detail sits on the Huntr pricing page. The page says your data remains available after a downgrade, while paid features become unavailable. Read that language before building a large pipeline around a feature you may not keep.
More fields mean more upkeep. That is the tradeoff.
3. OphyAI
OphyAI is a good fit for candidates who want the tracker connected to resume work and interview preparation. The product material in its job application tracker comparison documents board stages such as Saved, Applied, Interview, Offer, and Rejected.
Its useful idea is the next action. A role should not sit in an "Interview" column with no reminder or preparation task attached to it.
Turns out, the next action is often more useful than another dashboard. Choose this style if you want the tracker to prompt preparation, not just report where each application sits.
4. ApplyArc
ApplyArc takes a structured, personal-CRM approach to job searching. Its published comparison describes a job tracker with connected contacts and plan-based storage, including a free account for up to 100 saved jobs and a Pro account for up to 500.
Those limits may matter if you apply to roles steadily for several months. Contact records can also help you connect a recruiter, referral, or hiring manager to the relevant application rather than storing those details in separate notes.
The figures above come from the published comparison page, so confirm the current limits before relying on them. An export option matters too. You should be able to leave without losing your job history.
5. Notion
Notion is the do-it-yourself option. It gives you a database to build rather than a ready-made application tracker with one fixed workflow.
Start with fields for company, role, location, status, date applied, resume version, contact, next action, and follow-up date. Then use the view that helps you think clearly, whether that is a table or a board grouped by status.
To be honest, Notion only wins if you enjoy maintaining it. You will need to create the stages, decide how to capture listings, and keep the records consistent. That flexibility is valuable, but it is not the same as browser capture or autofill.
6. Resumly
Resumly is aimed at people who want more application assistance inside the tracking workflow. Its own comparison page says the free plan includes an automated tracker, an email inbox, one base resume, and 10 auto-applies.
Those are vendor-stated features, not a promised result. The same page discloses that Resumly is its own product, so read the claims as product information rather than independent testing.
Automation deserves a close look. Confirm whether you approve each submission, how the tool handles duplicate applications, which fields it fills, and whether you can review the final materials before anything is sent.
7. Simplify+
Simplify+ is the autofill-first candidate in this comparison. Its product listing positions it around autofilling applications, tracking jobs, and helping with AI resumes.
That approach can make sense when form completion is the slowest part of your search. Test it on the sites you actually use, though. A tool that works smoothly on one application portal may behave differently on another.
One comparison source flags the lack of a clearly published pricing page and refund policy for Simplify+. Treat that as a verification flag. Check the current terms before entering payment details.
8. Jobright
Jobright is one to investigate rather than select from a name-only list. The supplied comparison material contains more evidence about billing complaints in user reviews than about Jobright's current tracking workflow.
That does not establish that the product is unsuitable. It does mean you should test the basics first: saving a role, changing its status, exporting your records, and canceling a paid plan.
Do not move your entire search into an app until those four actions work as expected. A clean landing page is not enough.
9. Careerflow
Careerflow appears in current job-tracker comparisons as a candidate for resume and search workflows. The supporting review material also mentions refund friction, but those reports are anecdotal and should not be treated as a universal finding.
If Careerflow fits the way you prepare applications, read the cancellation and refund terms before upgrading. Then test whether the tracker stores the fields you actually use, including contacts, document versions, and follow-up dates.
The decision depends on the workflow, not just the feature list.
10. Prentus
Prentus sits between a job tracker and a broader career-support workspace. Its product comparison page presents job tracking alongside AI networking and application help.
That combination may suit candidates who want outreach and applications in one place. The page also discusses career-services use cases, so individual job seekers should confirm which account type, features, and data controls apply to them.
Ask where your records live and how you can export them. Small details like that become important when your search lasts longer than expected.
Teal versus Huntr
Teal and Huntr are the most useful head-to-head comparison for many individual job seekers.
| Task | Teal | Huntr |
|---|---|---|
| Capture a listing | Chrome extension and job-board capture | Browser extension and one-click job saving |
| Organize a pipeline | Job tracking with statuses and opportunity records | Detailed records with notes, tasks, dates, and company data |
| Manage resumes | Multiple resume versions are part of its product positioning | Resume builder and document-focused workflow |
| Track contacts | Available within the job-search workspace | Strong emphasis on contacts, companies, and relationships |
| Application assistance | Verify current plan behavior before assuming autofill or auto-apply | Autofill is part of the product positioning |
| Best fit | Candidates who save many roles while browsing | Candidates who want detailed records around each opportunity |
Choose Teal if the first problem is collecting promising jobs and keeping resume versions organized. Choose Huntr if the harder problem is managing details after you apply.
Neither app can decide whether a role is worth pursuing. You still need to read the listing, tailor your materials, and check the submitted information.
A job tracker workflow that stays useful
Set up the process before you import a large backlog.
- Choose a small set of statuses. Saved, Applied, Screening, Interview, Offer, Rejected, and Withdrawn are enough for most searches. Add more only when a real decision requires it.
- Capture the listing immediately. Record the company, title, location, listing link, and date saved. Job posts disappear, and memory gets unreliable fast.
- Attach the document version. Name resumes clearly, such as
MarketingResume-v3, and connect the right version to each application. - Record one next action. Use a specific instruction such as "send follow-up email Friday" or "prepare two portfolio examples." Avoid "follow up later."
- Add a due date. A task without a date is usually just a wish.
- Review the board once or twice each week. Close stale applications, update responses, and move active roles forward.
- Export your data before changing tools. Keep a copy of contacts, notes, dates, and application links outside the app.
The goal is not to maintain a perfect board. It is to stop losing useful information between applications.
The fields worth tracking
| Field | Why it helps |
|---|---|
| Company and role | Prevents duplicate applications |
| Listing link and date saved | Lets you recover the original details |
| Status and status date | Shows where the application stands |
| Resume version | Connects the result to the document you used |
| Cover letter or portfolio link | Keeps supporting materials together |
| Contact name and relationship | Makes outreach more specific |
| Next action and due date | Turns intention into a scheduled task |
| Salary, location, and work arrangement | Helps compare roles consistently |
| Notes from calls or interviews | Keeps important details out of scattered documents |
A tracker becomes much more useful when every active role has a next action. The small stuff matters: which resume did you use, who did you contact, and what happens next? All of it.
Free versus paid job tracking apps
A free plan is often enough for a focused search with a manageable number of applications. Notion can work well for a custom system, while Teal or Huntr may save time if browser capture and document handling matter more than total flexibility.
Pay for a plan when it removes a repeated bottleneck. That might be application autofill, deeper resume support, larger storage, or contact management. Do not pay simply because an app displays more charts.
Thing is, plan limits and cancellation rules matter more after you have built a full search history. Check export, data retention, document access, and downgrade behavior before upgrading.
Common questions
Is a job application tracker the same as an ATS?
No. An applicant tracking system is usually built for employers to manage candidates. A job application tracker is built for the job seeker to manage roles, documents, contacts, and follow-ups.
Do I need auto-apply?
Not necessarily. Autofill can reduce repetitive typing while leaving you in control of the final application. Auto-apply can submit applications for you, so verify the approval process, field accuracy, duplicate handling, and supported sites before using it.
Is Teal better than Huntr?
Neither is universally better. Teal is a sensible first test for job capture and resume versions. Huntr is a better fit for candidates who want detailed notes, tasks, contacts, company records, and application documents around each role.
Can Notion replace a dedicated job tracker?
Yes, if you are willing to build and maintain the system yourself. It is less attractive if you want automatic job capture, autofill, or a ready-made application pipeline.
What should I test during the first week?
Enter at least 10 real applications or saved roles. Then check whether you can find each listing, identify the resume used, see the next action, and export the record. If any of those steps feels awkward, change the workflow before your search grows.
Pick Teal, Huntr, or Notion and use it for one week with live applications. Keep the tool that shows every active role, its next action, and its supporting documents without making you search in three other places.